Discussion:
Panspermia vs. Pangenesis
(too old to reply)
JTEM is Magic
2021-10-11 21:55:36 UTC
Permalink
Panspermia: A theory where life arrives at a planet,
the earth has life because it fell here from space,
rather than spontaneously formed here (abiogenesis).

In its purest (original?) form, life began in space with
or soon after the Big Bang. But a variation of it could
be as simple as life arising on Mars, as it cooled and
became habitable before the earth, only to be blasted
into space by meteorite strikes and super volcanic
eruptions, to float around the solar system for perhaps
tens of millions of years before falling onto the
earth, "Contaminating" us with life...

That's Panspermia.

Pangenesis: Pseudo scientific rubbish and the one &
only "Theory" that Darwin came up with. No, not
evolution. The concept of evolution preceded Darwin
by a long way. He was trying to explain it, sort of, and
the "Natural Selection" he plagiarized sounds good
but what did that mean and how did it work? So
Darwin plagiarized another idea, Lamarckism, which
was pseudo scientific rubbish itself, and added some
invisible "Gemmules." When an animal was forced to
run, build up it's leg muscles, "big leg muscle" gemmules
were formed and traveled to the gonads, leading to
offspring with big leg muscles...

Utter crap.

Too cast even more shame on the fraud that was
Darwin: He already had the answer! Mendel had already
cracked the mystery of inheritance! AND, Mendel knew
it. Well, he was too stupid to understand a word of it but
he was exposed to it. Mendel had worked out inheritance,
Darwin saw it and then Darwin threw it all away in favor of
some pseudo scientific idiocy that he plagiarized from
somewhere else.

Pangenesis.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/664590992284008449
Mike
2021-10-11 22:11:49 UTC
Permalink
Panspermia: A theory where life arrives at a planet,
the earth has life because it fell here from space,
rather than spontaneously formed here (abiogenesis).
In its purest (original?) form, life began in space with
or soon after the Big Bang. But a variation of it could
be as simple as life arising on Mars, as it cooled and
became habitable before the earth, only to be blasted
into space by meteorite strikes and super volcanic
eruptions, to float around the solar system for perhaps
tens of millions of years before falling onto the
earth, "Contaminating" us with life...
That's Panspermia.
Pangenesis: Pseudo scientific rubbish and the one &
only "Theory" that Darwin came up with. No, not
evolution. The concept of evolution preceded Darwin
by a long way. He was trying to explain it, sort of, and
the "Natural Selection" he plagiarized sounds good
but what did that mean and how did it work? So
Darwin plagiarized another idea, Lamarckism, which
was pseudo scientific rubbish itself, and added some
invisible "Gemmules." When an animal was forced to
run, build up it's leg muscles, "big leg muscle" gemmules
were formed and traveled to the gonads, leading to
offspring with big leg muscles...
Utter crap.
Too cast even more shame on the fraud that was
Darwin: He already had the answer! Mendel had already
cracked the mystery of inheritance! AND, Mendel knew
it. Well, he was too stupid to understand a word of it but
he was exposed to it. Mendel had worked out inheritance,
Darwin saw it and then Darwin threw it all away in favor of
some pseudo scientific idiocy that he plagiarized from
somewhere else.
Pangenesis.
I think consciousness itself is the primordial
substance of creation. Since it exists outside
the domain of time it makes no sense to ask
where it came from. Everything comes from
it. All these theories are just 'vibrations' of
this conscious energy and in essence are all
just illusions. There is only one 'reality' and
you are experiencing it right at this very
instant. Take your experience out of the
equation and everything would evaporate
into absolutely nothing.
-- --
https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/664590992284008449
JTEM is Magic
2021-10-12 04:25:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
I think consciousness itself is the primordial
substance of creation.
That is certainly in agreement with a lot of the New Age stuff
I've read -- the "manifesting" and "Visualizing."
Post by Mike
Since it exists outside
the domain of time it makes no sense to ask
where it came from.
Oh of course. There can be no "Where," at least not in any sense
we can comprehend. HOW is a little bit different though. It seems
as if we should be able to "Know" the how, though nothing makes
a lick of sense to us.
Post by Mike
There is only one 'reality' and
you are experiencing it right at this very
instant.
I don't think so. The Multiverse makes too much sense to me. IT IS
one reality, so to speak, but not in a way that we are used to dealing
with.





-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/664677814901096448

Loading...